
Difference Between Vested And Contingent ownership
In this article, we will explore difference Between Vested And Contingent Ownership under jurisprudence in detail.
Before understanding the differences between Vested And Contingent ownership, lets firstly break down vested and contingent ownership. Vested and Contingent ownerships both are the kinds of ownership under jurisprudence.
Vested Ownership: Vested ownership refers to an absolute and unconditional right to property the owner has full legal control over it without any dependency on future events.
Contingent Ownership: In Contingent ownership, the owner does not have the full claim to the property, but he can claim it on the fulfillment of some conditions.
Types of Contingent and Vested ownership
Want to know more? Buy Complete Notes of This subject for In-Depth Understanding!
Difference Between Vested And Contingent ownership
Basis of Difference | Vested Ownership | Contingent Ownership |
Definition | Ownership is absolute and immediate | Ownership depends on a future condition being met |
When it takes effect | Immediate | Depends on a future event |
Certainty | Guaranteed and does not depend on future events | Ownership is uncertain |
Legal control | The owner has full legal control and can use, transfer, or sell the property | No control until the condition is met |
Risk of loss | No risk of losing ownership unless voluntarily transferred | Ownership may never materialize if the condition is not fulfilled |
Click here for previous year question papers of Jurisprudence -2 | Click Here for full notes of Jurisprudence -2 | Click Here For all articles on Jurisprudence -2 |
Condition Dependency | No conditions attached, ownership is finalized | Ownership arises only if a specified event or condition occurs |
Example | Inheritance with no conditions | Property given only if a person graduates |
One thought on “Difference Between Vested And Contingent ownership”